Editorial Policy

Purpose

Paid-survey content online is dominated by inflated income claims. This policy exists so readers can judge our work by a standard we have written down in advance.

Sourcing

• Platform facts come from provider documentation, terms of service and help centres.
• Any figure we have not verified is left blank and labelled unverified rather than estimated.
• Statistics are attributed to a named source or not used at all.
• We do not reproduce user testimonials, screenshots or earnings reports we cannot trace to a real, identifiable source.

Claims we do not make

• Guaranteed, typical or "up to" income figures presented as expectations.
• Full-time income framing for survey work — it is supplementary earning.
• First-hand testing that did not happen. Untested platforms say so plainly.
• Financial, tax or legal advice.

Reviews and ranking

Rankings follow the published rating methodology. Payment never buys a position, a score or a favourable conclusion. Where a listing is commercial, it is labelled at the point of the recommendation.

Review process

Every article names an author and a last-updated date. Material changes to a platform's payout terms, thresholds or availability trigger a re-check of every page citing them. Pages that can no longer be verified are unpublished rather than left to decay.

Use of AI

AI tools may assist with drafting and editing. A human is responsible for every published claim, and AI output is never published as verified fact without checking it against a primary source.

Independence and corrections

Advertisers get no preview of, or veto over, editorial conclusions. If we get something wrong we correct it and note the change — see the corrections policy.